The mere presence of an affiliate's representative at bargaining sessions where local union officials indicate that a strike vote will be taken by the local membership is not sufficient to impose liability on the affiliate.However, evidence of the representative's picketing during the strike may be sufficient. An affiliated organization's representative on an informational picket line during non-work hours is alone insufficient evidence to warrant a conclusion that the affiliated organization was condoning or encouraging a subsequent strike.In considering such cases, the CERB has held: If an employer alleges that a union's parent or affiliate organization has also violated Section 9A(a), it must introduce sufficient facts to establish such involvement. Information regarding the work action on the union’s website, including announcements or steps taken by the union’s executive board regarding an upcoming strike vote.Picketing by union officials during work hours.Union officials’ remarks indicating the existence of a strike vote by union members.The failure of union officers to report to work.Section 9A(a) also prohibits public employees or employee organizations from inducing, encouraging, or condoning a strike. Inducement, Encouragement, and Condonation The timing of absenteeism coincides with expressed labor relations frustration.ī.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |